Stokely Carmichael – Part 5: The Sit-in Movement and Howard University

Posted by giemmevi

Continuation of Stokely Carmichael – Part 4: The Stepladder Speakers’ Impact on the Soon-to-be Activist

… In 1960, when Carmichael attended his senior year at Bronx Science, the sit-in movement broke out throwing the spotlight on racial segregation that still persisted in the South.

When Carmichaell heard about it in the beginning he was quite skeptical towards the young black activists who carried out the first sit-ins:

when I first heard about the Negroes sitting-in at lunch counters down South, I thought they were just a bunch of publicity hounds.”

After a few weeks Stokely Carmichael changed his opinion:

Student activists sitting-in at a lunch counter had to support shameful white backlash.

Student activists sitting-in at a lunch counter had to support shameful white backlash.

“[...] but one night when I saw those kids on TV, getting back up on the lunch counter stools after being knocked off them, sugar in their eyes, catsup in their hair – well, something happened to me. Suddenly I was burning“.

Carmichael decided to get involved. Together with other New Yorkers, he  joined a boycott of a Washington D.C Woolworth store. Shortly afterwards Carmichael accompanied a youth division of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) on a trip to Virginia where, during a sit-in, he met members of the Nonviolent Action Group (NAG), a student group from Howard University, affiliated to the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.

In this occasion Carmichael was profoundly “impressed by the way they conducted themselves, the way they sat there and took the punishment,” to the point that he decided to decline various scholarship offers from prestigious universities in order to enroll to Howard University, a well known Negro School located in Washington D.C. , where Carmichael intended to join the Nonviolent Action Group.

To be continued…

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 7.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Stokely Carmichael – Part 4: The Stepladder Speakers' Impact on the Soon-to-be Activist

Posted by giemmevi

Continuation of Stokely Carmichael – Part 3: The Years at Bronx High School of Science

… On the streets of Harlem, more precisely on 125th street, Stokely Carmichael found what was missing in the white leftist world: a dynamic oratory concerning black nationalism and America’s racial problem. Both issues were addressed extensively by Harlem’s “stepladder speakers”, brilliant orators, who instructed their listeners on the history of black resistance and, more importantly, on the methods that needed to be adopted in the future.

To give my readers an idea of the Harlem Stepladder Speakers I uploaded an excerpt of Spike Lee’s “Malcolm X”, in which the camera swings from Malcolm X addressing a Harlem street crowd to two Stepladder Speakers.

YouTube Preview Image
Listening to the stepladder speakers Carmichael began to understand the enormous power of their rhetorical style, which he tried to absorb. In his biography Carmichael reports that “important elements of [his] adult speaking style-the techniques of public speaking in the dramatic African tradition of the spoken word, can be traced to these street corner orators of Harlem. To them and the Baptist preachers of the rural South”.

Moreover, the stepladder speakers with their black nationalist theories convinced Stokely Carmichael that the communists/socialists that supported black people inciting them to begin the “civil rights revolution” did so only because they needed an atmosphere  of chaos in order to raise a  systemic revolution.

To be continued…
Digg!

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Stokely Carmichael – Part 3: The Years at Bronx High School of Science

Posted by giemmevi

Continuation of “Stokely Carmichael’s Youth – From Port of Spain to New York City”.

… In 1956 Stokely Carmichael broke with the past. Being an “[...] intellectually precocious child, he [had] found American education a breeze compared with the British-based rigors he’d experienced in the Trinidadian school system”. Passing a tough entrance test he was admitted to the elitist Bronx High School of Science. Here Stokely soon had to find out that his intellectual background could not compete with that of his fellow students. In his biography Carmichael reports that “[his] parents never finished school, we had no intellectual background. All these students’ fathers had been at Harvard, Yale, doctors, dentists, PHDs. They had what I didn’t have”. As opposed to the others at Bronx Science, Stokely did not know anything about Karl Marx nor was he familiar with notions such as “dialectical materialism“. Competition was tough and Stokely thought about quitting school during his freshman year, but his parents, especially his mother, believing firmly in the american dream “wouldn’t accept it though. She wanted me to go to Science and she would have it no other way. No questions asked. ‘Remember one thing,’ she would say, ‘they’re white, they’ll make it. You won’t unless you’re on the top“.

Carmichael listened to his parents and started to read voraciously all the books his fellow students had already read and were discussing during lunch break: in this way he became familiar with Marx and got to know Darwin’s theories and Camus’ philosophy. Stokely “tried to develop [his] own [intellectual background] just beginning to read as quickly as [he] could, anything that anybody mentioned”.

Stokely Carmichael frequented the highly competitive Bronx High School of Science

Stokely Carmichael frequented the highly competitive Bronx High School of Science

With the new school Carmichael’s interest and friends changed. His Morris Park buddies stemming from the white working-class were exchanged with new friends from the white upper middle-class. These guys were about to attend elité universities such as Harvard, Columbia or Brandeis. Among them was the son of Eugene Dennis who introduced him to New York’s left-wing social world and consequently to the European revolutinary theories, this is how Stokely recalled the impact:

For the first time I encountered a systematic radical analysis, a critical context and vocabulary that explained and made sense of history. It explained the inequities and injustice I’d long been conscious of in the society around me and prescribed (even predicted) revolutionary solutions.

Nevertheless, Stokely Carmichael never joined any socialist organization because American socialism did not ascribe importance to the solution of the black problem inside the American society, quite the contrary, “[...] they didn’t want any discussion of black nationalism“. Ivanhoe Donaldson, another young New Yorker and fellow SNCC activist, underlined Carmichael’s point clarifying the reason why the socialist organizations were not able to attract black people:

“Race drove us first. We recognized class but placed it differently. Everybody in our generation did. Even the white folks in SNCC had a little bit of black nationalism in them”.

Digg!

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Stokely Carmichael – Part 2: Carmichael’s Youth, from Port of Spain to New York City

Posted by giemmevi

Stokely Standiford Churchill Carmichael was born in Trinidad in 1941. Since his mother Mabel Florence Charles Carmichael and his father Adolphus Carmichael both left Trinidad for the United States in search of work (respectively in 1944 and 1946) the young Stokely grew up at his grandmother’s house at Port of Spain. When in 1952 his parents were economically more secure Stokely was allowed to join his parents in Harlem, NY.

Stokely Carmichael - Born in Trinidad, grown up in New York City

Stokely Carmichael - Born in Trinidad he grew up in New York City

The first days in New York had a strong impact on Carmichael. Although a black community, Harlem displayed a visible contrast compared with Port of Spain, a contrast which bewildered the young boy: white people were in charge of the community, they held control. Policemen, teachers, merchants, entrepreneurs were all white. In contrast, in Trinidad, being 96% of the population black, it was natural to see black people holding crucial positions, such as policemen, teachers, attorneys, even if Trinidad was actually controlled by white colonists.

Thus, what seemed less evident to Carmichael in Trinidad, he was able to perceive taking a glance at the streets of New York: the black people‘s status of second-class citizens in the United States, more generally the black man’s subjugation to “The Man”. Conscious of this matter of fact, Stokely Carmichael’s parents had a deep distrust toward white people.

Notwithstanding, “by back-breaking, around-the-clock-work, Carmichael’s parents (his father was a carpenter and his mother was a maid) succeeded in buying a house in a good [...] Bronx neighborhood.” The family moved to Morris Park, East Bronx, a predominantly white neighborhood (inhabited by Italians, Jews and Irish).

As an immigrant from the West Indies, and therefore a non-native American citizen, Carmichael “had to do all the bad things to prove his point”. In order to not become an outsider the adolescent became the only black member of the juvenile gang “Morris Park Dukes”. Due to his intelligence and cleverness he soon became a “specialist in stealing hubcaps and car radios”.

Continuation of text → Stokely Carmichael – Part 3: The Years at Bronx Science


Digg!

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Stokely Carmichael – Part 1: The Initiator of Black Power

Posted by giemmevi

Stokely Carmichael at Berkeley.

Stokely Carmichael speaks at the University of California's Greek Theater, Berkeley, California, October 29, 1966, jammed with 14,000 people. (AP Photo)

This blog came primarily into being because I wanted to publish portions of my research on the black activist Stokely Carmichael and his rhetoric of Black Power.

I have always been fascinated by the strategic use of language and when I stumbled upon the following passage of Joshua Meyrowitz’s “No sense of Place” I decided to dedicate my attention to Carmichael’s rhetorical style.

“When Black Power advocate Stokely Carmichael found himself attracting media attention in the late 1960s, for example, his access to a larger social platform turned out to be a curse rather than a blessing. In the shared arenas of television and radio, he found himself facing at least two distinct audiences simultaneously: his primary audience of blacks, and an “eavesdropping” audience of whites. In personal (unmediated) appearances, he had been able to present two completely diffrent talks on Black Power to black and white audiences, respectively. But in the combined forums of electronic media, he had to decide whether to use a white or black rhetorical style and text. If he used a white style, he would alienate his primary audience and defeat his goals of giving blacks a new sense of pride and self-respect. Yet if he used a black rhetorical style, he would alienate whites, including many liberals who supported integration. With no clear solution, and unable to devise a composite genre, Carmichael decided to use a black style in his mediated speeches. While he sparked the fire of his primary audience, he also filled his secondary audience with hatred and fear and brought on the wrath of the white power structure”.

In my dissertation I analyzed and compared two speeches of the black activist, one addressed to a primarily black audience, the other one to a primarily white audience. My principal intention was to examine the distinctive characteristics of what the sociologist Joshua Meyrowitz referred to respectively as Carmichael’s black rhetorical style and white rhetorical style.

In order to support my analyses/interpretations of Carmichael’s critical discourses towards the United States I had to investigate in various directions, since the black activist not only accused the American social and political system for being permeated by racism, but stressed that even the nation’s cultural expressions upheld ‘white supremacy’.

In my next posts I will first of all introduce my readers to the person Stokely Carmichael and will successively concentrate on his political views before venturing on his public speeches.

Continuation of text → Stokely Carmichael – Part 2: Carmichael’s Youth, from Port of Spain to New York City

Digg!

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Inaugural Oath, second attempt: Barack Obama decided to take the oath again

Posted by giemmevi

Having messed up the inaugural oath during the presidential inauguration ceremonies on Capitol Hill, Obama was responsive to constitutional expert’s pleas urging him to retake the oath.

“It’s an open question whether he’s president until he takes the proper oath” stressed Jack Beermann, a Boston University constitutional scholar.  Moreover, Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University,  stressed that “[Obama]should probably go ahead and take the oath again,” explaining that “If he doesn’t, there are going to be people who for the next four years are going to argue that he didn’t meet the constitutional standard.”

White House counsel Greg Craig stated that “We believe the oath of office was administered effectively and that the president was sworn in appropriately yesterday. Yet the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of the abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice John Roberts will administer the oath a second time.”

Obama and Roberts repeat the oath

Obama and Roberts repeat the oath

Thus, Obama and Chief Justice John Roberts complying with the expert’s wishes, repeated the inaugural oath the White House Map Room in front of a small group of reporters.

Before Obama, two other presidents have repeated the oath because of similar issues, Calvin Coolidge and Chester A. Arthur.

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

The Inaugural Oath: Who messed it up? Chief Justice John Roberts or the 44th President of the United States Barack Obama?

Posted by giemmevi

When Barack Hussein Obama took the oath at 12.05 am he was already President of the the United States. The presidency did not start off too well for him though as there were obvious problems with the Inaugural Oath. Who messed up? Chief Justice John Roberts mixing up words or Barack Obama getting confused?

You decide.

This is the oath contained in the U.S Constitution:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

And here’s the transcript of what was actually said:

ROBERTS: Are you prepared to take the oath, Senator?

OBAMA: I am.

ROBERTS: I, Barack Hussein Obama…

OBAMA: I, Barack…

ROBERTS: … do solemnly swear…

OBAMA: I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear…

ROBERTS: … that I will execute the office of president to the United States faithfully…

OBAMA: … that I will execute…

ROBERTS: … faithfully the office of president of the United States…

OBAMA: … the office of president of the United States faithfully…

ROBERTS: … and will to the best of my ability…

OBAMA: … and will to the best of my ability…

ROBERTS: … preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

OBAMA: … preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

ROBERTS: So help you God?

OBAMA: So help me God.

ROBERTS: Congratulations, Mr. President.

To help you decide, here’s the clip of the oath:

YouTube Preview Image
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

These Sites broadcast Barack Obama's Presidential Inauguration

Posted by giemmevi

For those of you who want to follow Barack Obama’s Presidential Inauguration online, here’s a list of sites that will broadcast the event on January 20.

The Inaugural Ceremonies will start at 10am EST (16.00 CET) at the U.S. Capitol. Most of the Live Streams might begin earlier.

You might be interested in foreign coverage of the event, and, above all, listen to it in different languages:

  • Terra provides coverage both in English and in Spanish.
  • For the Germans out there, the best coverage most probably will be provided by the ARD’s Tagesschau.
  • The Italians might want to check Rai News 24.

Any further suggestions regarding foreign live streams are more than welcome!

Finally, here’s a schedule of the ceremony:

  • Musical Selections: The United States Marine Band, followed by The San Francisco Boys Chorus and the San Francisco Girls Chorus
  • Call to Order and Welcoming Remarks: Senator Dianne Feinstein (D) California
  • Invocation: Dr. Rick Warren
  • Musical Selection: Ms. Aretha Franklin
  • Vice President-elect Joseph R. Biden, Jr. will be sworn into office by Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, the Honorable John Paul Stevens.
  • Musical Selection: Mr. John Williams, composer/arranger with Mr. Itzhak Perlman – violin, Mr. Yo-Yo Ma – cello, Ms. Gabriela Montero – piano and Mr. Anthony McGill – clarinet.
  • President-elect Barack Hussein Obama will take the Oath of Office, using President Lincoln’s Inaugural Bible, administered by the Chief Justice of the United States, the Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr.
  • President Obama’s Inaugural Address
  • Poem: Ms. Elizabeth Alexander
  • Benediction: The Reverend Dr. Joseph E. Lowery
  • The National Anthem: The United States Navy Band “Sea Chanters”

After the Inaugural Address the 44th president of the United States will escort the outgoing president of the United States, George W. Bush, to a departure ceremony before attending a luncheon in the Capitol’s Statuary Hall.

The 56th Inaugural Parade will make its way down Pennsylvania Avenue from the Capitol to the White House.

In the evening, the Presidential Inaugural Committee will host ten official Inaugural Balls.

Enjoy!

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

A Conservative's Gedanken Experiment regarding Hip-Hop

Posted by giemmevi

As the first black president is getting ready to be sworn into office it’s no wonder that anything bearing the label “Black” is regaining territory in the media. Moreover, everyone has to put in his two cents on matters unhesitatingly labeled black. Even the “Crunchy Con” Rod Dreher felt it necessary to drop a couple of lines on his unnecessary blog about something blacker than George Bush’s Barney in February 2006, about the black cultural manifestation par excellence: Hip-Hop.

The Dreher article “Obama and hip-hop’s future”, true to the beliefnet-style,beliefnet1 expresses an inspirational, spiritual and faithful criticism on Hip-Hop. The article actually consists of two opening sentences, a quotation, and three closing sentences. Dreher introduces the quotation his piece is grounded on by calling what he’s about to report an “interesting story” written by Stanley Crouch. Even though Crouch, being an “African-American jazz critic”, might be more qualified than the Crunchy Con as far as concerns black cultural manifestations, his reported story seems simply ridiculous to me:

A friend of mine who lives in California remarked to his grandson that he did not like the way rappers dressed or carried themselves. His grandson told him that he needs to stop living in the past and catch up before the plane leaves.

My friend noticed, as usual, that his grandson did not dress or carry himself in the style or manner he was defending. So he decided to ask him some questions. Shoot, said the young man, ready to straighten out his grandfather.

If you were on a plane waiting to take off, my friend asked him, and the pilot and the co-pilot came on with their pants sagging to the ground, covered with tattoos, mouths full of gold teeth and wearing braids, what would you do? His grandson told him he would get off the plane as fast as he could. No doubt.

My friend then asked if his grandson’s baby daughter had been hurt and she was taken to the emergency room, how would he feel if the doctors on duty looked like the men about to fly the plane. “I would,” said the younger man, “get her the hell out of there.”

At that point, my friend wondered what would happen to young black men who showed up looking for work but seemed more ready for a hip-hop performance than for a job?

The answer: They probably would not get hired. Case closed.

Dreher needed this pointless, senseless, ridiculous, anything but interesting Crouch-story to prepare the reader for the main message of the article contained in its final three sentences:

As for me, I don’t care what color you are, if you’re a kid who listens to hip-hop, I don’t want my kids playing with you. I want my kids to have consciences that find hip-hop’s lyrical content and themes repulsive. Which is to say, I want my kids to have a strong and uncompromising sense of character.

Way to go, Crunchy Con!

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Even Magazines can be found now through Google Book Search

Posted by giemmevi

After books, newspapers and photos, Google Book Search has now included magazines into the list of media that can be rummaged through online. For nowthere is talk about 10 magazines (shortly the number is supposed to rise to more than one hundred) that can be found and read through. Among others thefollowing are already available: Jet, Popular Science, Bulletin Of Atomic Scientists, Prevention, Runner’s World, New York Magazine and last but not least Ebony.

Screenshot of Google Book Search result for "Ebony"

Screenshot of Google Book Search result for "Ebony"

I thought to let my readers know about this feature as for me it would have been particularly helpful if it had existed about two years ago when I did research in Italy for my thesis (on Stokely Carmichael and the Rhetoric of Black Power). Even though my University had a North American Studies library that was well furnished, an online availability of articles would have been really time saving.

Since I found a very interesting article on Carmichael in Ebony during my research in the aforementioned library I was eager to scroll through it online. Unfortunately I could not find the entire issue (September 1966) and had to discover that it’s not the only issue missing. I hope its only a question of time. Please do let me know when you see it online!

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)